gautrang wrote:
Hmn, but then, shouldn't the Simple Past tense suffice here? To acknowledged that it happened in the past should be enough right?
I usually see the past perfect when there is the past simple also in the same sentence to indicate what action happens first. This is not the case here.
The past perfect refers to a time earlier than before now.It is used to make it clear that one action happened before another action in the past and the effect of the earlier action on the later one is felt in the
...
.jpg)
