I have a stupid question.
The question asks to weaken the argument and not the conclusion. The argument wouldn´t be that this policy is selfish and helps only dictators?
Should I always go straight to weaken the conclusion in this kind of question, no matter if the question refers to conclusion or argument?
The question asks to weaken the argument and not the conclusion. The argument wouldn´t be that this policy is selfish and helps only dictators?
Should I always go straight to weaken the conclusion in this kind of question, no matter if the question refers to conclusion or argument?



.jpg)






