pqhai wrote:
This question uses a common fallacy"appeal to novelty"
The form is:
X is newer than Y
--OR--
X has new characteristics that are better than those of Y.
Therefore, X is correct, better, or preferable.
The conclusion is true only if:
(1) X is at least as good as Y (retain original advantages)
--OR--
(2) X does not create new weaknesses that Y does not have.
ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:
Fact: By splicing a rose with a species of onion they managed to create a flower that looks like the
...

.jpg)




