The striking point her was that we dont have to weaken the conclusion, but we need to weaken the claim made i.e. 'Those small domestic mills will take more business from the big American steel mills than would have been taken by the foreign steel mills in the absence of quotas.'
We are so used to weaken the conclusion, but it is the specific statement that we need to undermine.
Was tricky and cheeky!!!
We are so used to weaken the conclusion, but it is the specific statement that we need to undermine.
Was tricky and cheeky!!!
