Katnisslogic wrote:
So this is how I attacked the question:
The question tells us that there is a reasoning error in the stimulus, and that it's an assumption that is NECESSARY for the conclusion to be drawn.
The stimulus:
Premise 1: Indie Bookstores have decreased because Chain BS increased
Premise 2: B/c of the shortage (ie. Indie BS decrease), the variety of readily available books has slowed.
Conclusion: "Chain bookstores' success has been to the detriment of book consumers".
So, before going
...







