The faulty comparison here is between "growth rate" of the fish and the fish "growing".
The point is that the 2 are different.
Eliminate A and B.
Not sure what specific rule E is violating but the ", with" just feels way out of place in the sentence.
I can't think of a specific reason for eliminating C except that D looks better...
The point is that the 2 are different.
Eliminate A and B.
Not sure what specific rule E is violating but the ", with" just feels way out of place in the sentence.
I can't think of a specific reason for eliminating C except that D looks better...
