This argument is an opinion. Argument assumes that the facts are sufficient to prove the conclusion.
Fallacy: Just because people saved and invested more in the 1970s than in 1980s is sufficient to prove the conclusion? Are there other possibilities that could have explained the observation?
Fallacy: Just because people saved and invested more in the 1970s than in 1980s is sufficient to prove the conclusion? Are there other possibilities that could have explained the observation?




