DAakash7 wrote:
I am also looking for the explanation of this query. Could anyone expert answer this, please.
jeetmech152 wrote:
egmat wrote:
Hi Deepak,
The second analysis of the sentence is absurd, since the members are the subject of the verb 'taking' and the sentence makes no sense without the second clause. This is the second query of yours that I've seen in which you've tried to make sense of a sentence by removing a part of it. This is not recommended at all.
As for why option A is wrong, let's look at this part of youranalysis: Meaning Cl2: Fund members made monthly payment of their part ,then as a result of that they took turns to draw on the funds for something .
The second analysis of the sentence is absurd, since the members are the subject of the verb 'taking' and the sentence makes no sense without the second clause. This is the second query of yours that I've seen in which you've tried to make sense of a sentence by removing a part of it. This is not recommended at all.
As for why option A is wrong, let's look at this part of youranalysis: Meaning Cl2: Fund members made monthly payment of their part ,then as a result of that they took turns to draw on the funds for something .
...
.jpg)





