Well noted. Thanks a lotMartyTargetTestPrep
Notnecessarily.
MartyTargetTestPrep wrote:
Pankaj0901 wrote:
As explained in the post (link below) that COMMA + VERB 'ING' modifies the nearest preceding ACTION (say action no. 1):
Can we eliminate the option in case it fails to doso?
Can we eliminate the option in case it fails to doso?
Notnecessarily.
Quote:
OR,
We must further roll our eyes back to see if the ACTION preceding (say action no. 2) to the nearest ACTION, action no. 1, can be the logical referent, and if the action no. 2 makes sense, then action no. 2 is RIGHTFULLY and UNAMBIGUOUSLY the correct referent
...
We must further roll our eyes back to see if the ACTION preceding (say action no. 2) to the nearest ACTION, action no. 1, can be the logical referent, and if the action no. 2 makes sense, then action no. 2 is RIGHTFULLY and UNAMBIGUOUSLY the correct referent
...
![FLO – Therapy at the Club – Pre-Single [iTunes Plus M4A]](http://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Music221/v4/a4/11/88/a41188ed-0f2e-e8d5-1163-d59e373cc58c/26UMGIM30046.rgb.jpg/208x208bb.webp)
