AndrewN wrote:
Namangupta1997 wrote:
HiAndrewN
How is BF1supporting the conclusion? Whether the fragments contain Sulphur has no bearing on how big they were. I straightway eliminated E using that logic. What did I miss?
How is BF1supporting the conclusion? Whether the fragments contain Sulphur has no bearing on how big they were. I straightway eliminated E using that logic. What did I miss?
Hello,Namangupta1997 . It might help to think of this one in pictorial terms. Imagine what the astronomer, the author/speaker of contents of the passage, is hoping to argue, regarding the presence of unprecedented traces ofsulfur found in Jupiter's outer atmosphere... after the fragments'entry.
[align=center]
...








