This is a third rate question. Very bad question. I hope no one gets such a silly question on the real exam day.
Essence of the argument:- There are people (proponents) who want DULLNIC drug to become legal and there is Grant institute who say it's useless to legalise it.
Proper deconstruction of the argument
Premise 1) Grant institute say legal DULLNIC will be of higher quality and less price.
Premise 2) But DULLNIC sales are very low in FRUITLAND
Conclusion) So, even if DULLNIC is legalised
...
Essence of the argument:- There are people (proponents) who want DULLNIC drug to become legal and there is Grant institute who say it's useless to legalise it.
Proper deconstruction of the argument
Premise 1) Grant institute say legal DULLNIC will be of higher quality and less price.
Premise 2) But DULLNIC sales are very low in FRUITLAND
Conclusion) So, even if DULLNIC is legalised
...
.jpg)
