jabhatta2 wrote:
^^^^
ChiranjeevSingh AnishPassi KarishmaB zhanbo
Thus, with the information in (D) -- (D) allows for the possibility that revenues have increased by 70 % and profit/acre MORE THAN DOUBLED -- If the costs are low enough, an increase of revenues of 70 % is MORE THANENOUGH for profit/acre to double (> 100 % increase)
Why then is (D) still wrong when one could technically reach the desired result (of doubling profits/acre) within the parameters provided by (D) - it is mathematically
...
ChiranjeevSingh AnishPassi KarishmaB zhanbo
Thus, with the information in (D) -- (D) allows for the possibility that revenues have increased by 70 % and profit/acre MORE THAN DOUBLED -- If the costs are low enough, an increase of revenues of 70 % is MORE THANENOUGH for profit/acre to double (> 100 % increase)
Why then is (D) still wrong when one could technically reach the desired result (of doubling profits/acre) within the parameters provided by (D) - it is mathematically
...
![FLO – Therapy at the Club – Pre-Single [iTunes Plus M4A]](http://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Music221/v4/a4/11/88/a41188ed-0f2e-e8d5-1163-d59e373cc58c/26UMGIM30046.rgb.jpg/208x208bb.webp)
