sv2023 wrote:
Hi experts,KarishmaB GMATNinja
I reached the right ans B but I have a doubt regarding option D.
I have read in manhattan SC book that whichever clause comes first is the instigator and the second clause/modifier is the result. So by that logic D should not imply reverse meaning as pointed out by someone in the post above.
Can you pls explain exactly why D iswrong?
Meaning wise, we do use 'being' as 'because' informally.
There being no applicants, the interviews were cancelled.
So when
...
