AndrewN
I interpreted (D) as this:
D. It overlooks the possibility that even if there is a strong correlation between two phenomena( phenomenon 1: physical banking, phenomenon 2: onlinebanking ), neither of those phenomena are necessarily causally responsible for the other.
Author concludes:
physical banking -> revitalize impoverished local communities.
online banking -> not revitalize impoverished local communities
Can't we say that phenomenon 1 (physical banking) and phenomenon 2 (online
...
I interpreted (D) as this:
D. It overlooks the possibility that even if there is a strong correlation between two phenomena( phenomenon 1: physical banking, phenomenon 2: onlinebanking ), neither of those phenomena are necessarily causally responsible for the other.
Author concludes:
physical banking -> revitalize impoverished local communities.
online banking -> not revitalize impoverished local communities
Can't we say that phenomenon 1 (physical banking) and phenomenon 2 (online
...
.jpg)
