McBride compares the relative likelihood of injury to the occupants of different types of cars. Leggett shifts the focus to the overall chance of injury (to anybody) based on a consideration of both vehicles involved in an accident.
C is the only choice that describes Leggett's side accurately.
I think E is a betteroption.
The "the course of action advocated by McBride" is to oppose the new fuel-efficiency standards. There's no reason to believe that would be impossible to do.
...
C is the only choice that describes Leggett's side accurately.
Naveengkp022 wrote:
I think E is a betteroption.
The "the course of action advocated by McBride" is to oppose the new fuel-efficiency standards. There's no reason to believe that would be impossible to do.
...
![[GET] Justin Leung – Content Academy 3.0 ($997.00)](http://i.imgur.com/YVZpmGa.png)
![Alice In Chains – Sap – EP [iTunes Plus M4A]](http://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Music/47/35/c7/mzi.ljwsgbez.jpg/592x592bb.webp)
![Chad Lawson – Awakening: The Stillness Within (2026) [FLAC 24bit/48kHz]](http://imghd.xyz/images/2026/05/09/x5d03jw9bi367_600.jpg)
