himanshu0123 wrote:
super confuse b/w B] and C]
C] is pretty straightforward
but B] is quite complex as strenthener. What framework should I use to understand the right answer. I am finding B] difficult tocomprehend.
This is a "correlation —> causation" argument. These arguments, unlike almost everything else in CR, can actually be approached systematically.
This framework isexhaustive:
[color=#92278f] If a correlation exists between X and Y things, there are exactly three possible reasons for
...
![Madonna – Who’s That Girl (1987/2020) [FLAC 24bit/192kHz]](http://imghd.xyz/images/2023/06/08/0093624951148_6004dceff9e1db710a9.jpg)
