dave13 wrote:
KarishmaB wrote:
vdadwal wrote:
Karishma,
Lets say the hunting season is from Jan to June and for many years the hunters reach the 5% goal in april. How does this weaken the argument that If we drop the restriction altogether than it will help other species.
In D , it is stated that they have moved on to a different location so dropping the restriction will have noaffect.
Lets say the hunting season is from Jan to June and for many years the hunters reach the 5% goal in april. How does this weaken the argument that If we drop the restriction altogether than it will help other species.
In D , it is stated that they have moved on to a different location so dropping the restriction will have noaffect.
Option B tells you that the restriction has not come into effect since many years. "It has been many years since ..." means the restriction came
...
