zw504 wrote:
Harley1980 wrote:
zw504 wrote:
A directly attacks the premise. Is it common in weaken Q? I mean, it's extraneous to the conclusion..
Hellozw504
The argument says about "Perl grant" program and the answer A says about "programs targeted at improving access...". So these facts do not contradict each other.
"Perl grant" can be reduced but other similar programs can be increased and in total, disadvantaged students will receive more money from the budget
Thank you Harley1980.
I found the point to
...
![FLO – Therapy at the Club – Pre-Single [iTunes Plus M4A]](http://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Music221/v4/a4/11/88/a41188ed-0f2e-e8d5-1163-d59e373cc58c/26UMGIM30046.rgb.jpg/208x208bb.webp)
.jpg)
