Lets say X=environmental problem that is not the result of government mismanagement
Thus to solve X means pushing for economically enticing changes. Now lets say Y=any serious ecological problem. Acc to the argument very few Y's will be solved unless economically enticing changes happen. So it means most Y's are X/few Y's are not X.
A. Few Y are non X. (correct)
B. No X has economically feasible solution. We know that most Y's are X and if the X has no solution than we can't conclude at first
...
Thus to solve X means pushing for economically enticing changes. Now lets say Y=any serious ecological problem. Acc to the argument very few Y's will be solved unless economically enticing changes happen. So it means most Y's are X/few Y's are not X.
A. Few Y are non X. (correct)
B. No X has economically feasible solution. We know that most Y's are X and if the X has no solution than we can't conclude at first
...
.jpg)
