EBITDA wrote:
Professor Branch, who is chair of the sociology department, claims she saw a flying saucer the other night. But since she is a sociologist rather than a physicist, she cannot possibly be acquainted with the most recent writings of our finest scientists that tend to discount such sightings, so we can conclude that her report is unreliable.
Which of the following would be the most appropriate criticism of the author's analysis?
A) The author makes an irrelevant attack on Professor Branch's credentials.
...
.jpg)
