For me it was between B and C.
B says, FA was not provided with product detail and this resulted in incorrect prediction. So if this is true, will explain why there is a contradiction. SO LET KEEP THIS.
Now C says, FA was not provided with complete product. But there is no assumption that FA need complete product to do prediction. Outside world it might b true, but in this context, C doesnt say reason for the contradict.
B says, FA was not provided with product detail and this resulted in incorrect prediction. So if this is true, will explain why there is a contradiction. SO LET KEEP THIS.
Now C says, FA was not provided with complete product. But there is no assumption that FA need complete product to do prediction. Outside world it might b true, but in this context, C doesnt say reason for the contradict.







.jpg)



