ravi67741 wrote:
Q. Praising a historian for factual accuracy in describing events is like praising an architect for using well - seasoned timber or properly mixed concrete in a building.
The author of this argument is arguing that
a. non-historians can appreciate well-written historical accounts, but they cannot judge the accuracy of a historian's version of events.
b. history is analogous to architecture in that both disciplines build on foundation laid by other profession.
c. a good historian must have
...
.jpg)
