Navinder wrote:
Hi VeritasPrepKarishma,
In choice D, the % of people who did not own livestock and still supported the bill are still 88%. So, how come this is an assumption that people who are supporting it are influenced by it.
And in choice A, you expected 5 people who own livestock to vote. Isn't that an assumption. Thanks.
The point is that since the representation of livestock owners is higher than expected (12% instead of the expected 5%) among the voters, the argument is concluding that the bill affects
...
![FLO – Therapy at the Club – Pre-Single [iTunes Plus M4A]](http://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Music221/v4/a4/11/88/a41188ed-0f2e-e8d5-1163-d59e373cc58c/26UMGIM30046.rgb.jpg/208x208bb.webp)
.jpg)
