sayantanc2k wrote:
abhimahna wrote:
daagh, please provide your views here. Thanks
Since the no. of months is not determined by the phrase "ensuing months", option A is possible if the "ensuing months" is not equal to 4 months.
Nonetheless, D may also be true - implementation of X may just be coincidental and not causal. It is possible that some other regulation Y was implemented and that caused this change in market scenario.
So, in my view all options could be true.
...







