Hi,technically speaking, thiswould be a case of pronoun ambiguity, becausehe has two eligible antecedents:Homer andMarge .
In such cases, the general practice is tosplit the sentence in terms of the twoclauses :
i) Homer told Marge
ii) he ate all of the cake.
Hence, it can bepresumed thathe (thepronoun-subject of the clause) refers toHomer (thenoun-subject of the previous clause). To summarize, a pronoun-subject of a clause can be presumed to refer to noun-subject of the previous
...
In such cases, the general practice is tosplit the sentence in terms of the twoclauses :
i) Homer told Marge
ii) he ate all of the cake.
Hence, it can bepresumed thathe (thepronoun-subject of the clause) refers toHomer (thenoun-subject of the previous clause). To summarize, a pronoun-subject of a clause can be presumed to refer to noun-subject of the previous
...
.jpg)
