manhasnoname wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
manhasnoname wrote:
Going by your logic, OA doesn't make sense, does it?
The choice should have been "than they were ..." . Am I correct?
The choice should have been "than they were ..." . Am I correct?
The OA compares nouns (prices now andprices of an year ago .) If the comparison were between clauses , then "they were" would be required. Clause comparison allows omission of repeated parts in some cases, but not in this example. Please see my post above.
Noun comparison: Prices now is higher than prices then.
Clause comparison: Prices are now higher than
...
![FLO – Therapy at the Club – Pre-Single [iTunes Plus M4A]](http://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Music221/v4/a4/11/88/a41188ed-0f2e-e8d5-1163-d59e373cc58c/26UMGIM30046.rgb.jpg/208x208bb.webp)
.jpg)
