Hi Mike, thanks for your explanation.
While I arrived at option A using the same reasoning, I have reason to think this is not really an assumption, only seems like one. The conclusion in question is "The fact that there is correlation with eye skills -they need not be fixed - implies IQ is hereditary". Now a true assumption when negated (or seen as a bridge) should break (lead to) this conclusion.
Option A, however, is the assumption only for the claim that "eye skills are not
...
While I arrived at option A using the same reasoning, I have reason to think this is not really an assumption, only seems like one. The conclusion in question is "The fact that there is correlation with eye skills -they need not be fixed - implies IQ is hereditary". Now a true assumption when negated (or seen as a bridge) should break (lead to) this conclusion.
Option A, however, is the assumption only for the claim that "eye skills are not
...






.jpg)



