EducationAisle wrote:
sanghar wrote:
Worst case I can say parallelism is being violated as one clause uses past perfect and the other clause uses present perfect. Is this good enough to disqualify option A?
Hi sanghar, difference intenses does not amount to parallelism violation. Different parts of the sentence can be in different tenses.
As an aside, the original sentence does not use anyperfect tense. First portion usessimple present , while second portion usessimple past .
Having said that, the difference in tenses
...


.jpg)







