arigatoxoxo Option D is wrong because it is not necessary for the individuals who made the paintings to engage in seasonal migration. Even by visiting once to one region of Europe to another they could have witnessed those animals that are common on the Italian peninsula. So, even if negate this option the argument could stillhold.
nikitathegreat
Option C is wrong because when we negate this option it becomes:
The animals depicted in the paintings in Lausanne are depicted in the cave paintings of other regions of Switzerland.
So, even if paintings are depicted in the cave paintings of other regions of Switzerland, it could still be true that the individuals from those other regions traveled to Italy to see these animals. Basically, depiction of these animals in the cave paintings of other regions of Switzerland does not necessarily mean that they existed in those regions at that point of time.
...
nikitathegreat
Option C is wrong because when we negate this option it becomes:
The animals depicted in the paintings in Lausanne are depicted in the cave paintings of other regions of Switzerland.
So, even if paintings are depicted in the cave paintings of other regions of Switzerland, it could still be true that the individuals from those other regions traveled to Italy to see these animals. Basically, depiction of these animals in the cave paintings of other regions of Switzerland does not necessarily mean that they existed in those regions at that point of time.
...
Statistics : Posted by bv8562 • on 10 Oct 2023, 01:30 • Replies 6 • Views 311
.jpg)
