Option Elimination -
(A) used the information obtained to find evidence supporting - "used" can be parallel to "suspected," but that doesn't make sense. "used" is not parallel to "taped" because "of having taped" is an earlier action before they used the information. They are not taping and using the information at the same time. So, the only option left is "used" and "suspected." But the meaning is a disaster.
(B) used such information as they obtained to find evidence supporting - same as A - "used" and "suspected" parallelism issue.
(C) used the information they had obtained to find evidence that would support - same as A - "used" and "suspected" parallelism issue.
(D) of using the information they had obtained to find evidence that would support - makes sense. Here, the prepositional phrase "of using ..." is parallel to the earlier prepositional phrase "of
...
(A) used the information obtained to find evidence supporting - "used" can be parallel to "suspected," but that doesn't make sense. "used" is not parallel to "taped" because "of having taped" is an earlier action before they used the information. They are not taping and using the information at the same time. So, the only option left is "used" and "suspected." But the meaning is a disaster.
(B) used such information as they obtained to find evidence supporting - same as A - "used" and "suspected" parallelism issue.
(C) used the information they had obtained to find evidence that would support - same as A - "used" and "suspected" parallelism issue.
(D) of using the information they had obtained to find evidence that would support - makes sense. Here, the prepositional phrase "of using ..." is parallel to the earlier prepositional phrase "of
...
Statistics : Posted by Raman109 • on 31 Dec 2009, 06:26 • Replies 56 • Views 43494
