Ishmeet7 wrote:
Can someone explain why E could be wrong? While I agree D is a good answer, I'm not being able to reject E completely.
If we negate E, the ones who did see the tiger are experienced naturalists. Why would naturalists be wrong?
IF you negate E. Those who have reported sighting of the Tasmanian tigers ARE experienced naturalist. Who can say "experienced" naturalist can "correctly spot" a Tasmanian tiger. Even if they are, they can lie about it? This is a lot of making up story just to explain the answers. Typically, if you have to make up so much story to justify an answer, the answer probably is false.
D on another hand.
If the tigers DID make a major move and adapted to a different habitat. Conclusion is fault. The tigers are NOT extinct. (No stories needed, just common logic)
Statistics : Posted by chienp054 • on 21 Jun 2021, 07:00 • Replies 4 • Views 2455
