ashutosh_73 wrote:
Quote:
C. claiming that there is evidence showing that one of its premises is false
The biologist thinks that sea lice transmission is unlikely because the conditions in the archipelago "tend to suppress" sea-lice proliferation. The professor provides additional information, and then says that, actually, the conditions "favor theflourishing of sea lice."
Because the information provided by the professor completely contradicts the biologist's premise, we can determine that this additional evidence shows that the biologist's premise is false.
(C) is looking good.
D. questioning the reliability of the biologist's scientific sources
The professor never questions WHERE the biologist got his/her information, or the validity of those sources. (D) isout.
The biologist thinks that sea lice transmission is unlikely because the conditions in the archipelago "tend to suppress" sea-lice proliferation. The professor provides additional information, and then says that, actually, the conditions "favor theflourishing of sea lice."
Because the information provided by the professor completely contradicts the biologist's premise, we can determine that this additional evidence shows that the biologist's premise is false.
(C) is looking good.
D. questioning the reliability of the biologist's scientific sources
The professor never questions WHERE the biologist got his/her information, or the validity of those sources. (D) isout.
HiKarishmaB GMATNinja
I was stuck between (C) and (D) and ended up choosing the wrong answer. Below is my understanding, pleasehelp!
Biologist:
Conclusion: ''transmission of sea lice from farm salmon to
...
Statistics : Posted by KarishmaB • on 28 Apr 2020, 09:26 • Replies 32 • Views 36791




