(A) pointing out the limitations of the study's scope in assessing the impact of the public park on physical fitness.
-- The author is not assessing the impact of the public park on physical fitness but rather stating additional factors that contributed to the result. Eliminate.
(B) suggesting that the study's reliance on self-reported data might not accurately reflect the actual change in residents' physical fitness.
-- No such suggestion has been made by the author. Eliminate.
(C) introducing additional factors that could have influenced the citywide physical fitness trends during the same period.
-- Correct. The author lists down additional key factors that must've influenced the fitness trends, something that the study overlooks.
(D) questioning the validity of using the number of weekly exercise hours as a measure of physical fitness.
-- The argument doesn't question the number of weekly exercise hours. Eliminate,
(E) arguing that the study's timeframe was not sufficient to capture
...
-- The author is not assessing the impact of the public park on physical fitness but rather stating additional factors that contributed to the result. Eliminate.
(B) suggesting that the study's reliance on self-reported data might not accurately reflect the actual change in residents' physical fitness.
-- No such suggestion has been made by the author. Eliminate.
(C) introducing additional factors that could have influenced the citywide physical fitness trends during the same period.
-- Correct. The author lists down additional key factors that must've influenced the fitness trends, something that the study overlooks.
(D) questioning the validity of using the number of weekly exercise hours as a measure of physical fitness.
-- The argument doesn't question the number of weekly exercise hours. Eliminate,
(E) arguing that the study's timeframe was not sufficient to capture
...
Statistics : Posted by rishikavats17 • on 21 Dec 2023, 06:00 • Replies 15 • Views 193











