AbhiGarg2007 wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
AmritaSarkar89 wrote:
experts can I get a detailed explaination?
Do you have any specific query about any particular doubt?
In general:
The passage states that there has been no advertising of tobacco in Norway; yet there is prevalence of smoking among teenagers there. Therefore something else, not advertisements, caused this prevalence. Hence option A is correct.
Hi sayantanc2k
Please help me in understanding why choice B is wrong here ?
One example is not enough to generalize a hypothesis. Hence B is wrong.
...
![Midge Ure – A Man of Two Worlds (2026) [Official Digital Download 24bit/96kHz]](http://imghd.xyz/images/2026/05/09/zvc67e2mth34l_600.jpg)
.jpg)
