chiplesschap wrote:
I couldn't eliminate E as easily as some others.
Prediction uncertainty : a) Gasoline price goes up -> People switch to Hybrid
b) Gasoline price goes down - People wouldn't switch to Hybrid
Since it is possible prices *can reduce* (however low it may be), this choice does make politicians argument vulnerable. In a world with no option A, E would have been the correct answer,no?
Posted from my mobiledevice
Here is the point - we have to weaken the conclusion of the argument.
What is the conclusion? We can help reduce the total amount of pollution emitted by cars in this country by highlighting this advantage of hybrid cars.
We need to worry about whether we can help reduce the total amount of pollution emitted by cars by highlighting this advantage.
We are given that motorists can save money by driving cars that are more fuel efficient, and they will be encouraged to drive hybrid cars if we make them aware of that fact. So this is something we take to be true and not worry
...
Statistics : Posted by KarishmaB • on 01 Aug 2015, 10:50 • Replies 27 • Views 62669
.jpg)
