ashutosh_73 wrote:
Hi Experts,
I find (A), (D), (E) equally tempting. Can't find errors to eliminate them, please clarify.
Stimulus breakdown:
P1: Re-election received more financial support from property developers
+
P2: voting recd. favors the interest of property developers
=====================================
Conclusion:letting campaign contri influence his vote in cityC
Here's(D):
Quote:
presumes that one thing is the cause of another when it could easily be an effect ofit
Joshi is on the city council rightnow . Hispast voting record favors the interests of property developers. Property developers are supporting his re-election campaign with contributions.
The author concludes from this that the campaign contributions are CAUSING his pro-property votes. But what if he wasalready pro-property, and THAT caused property developers to support him with contributions? The argument totally misses this -- it assumes that the contributions caused the votes, but it could easily be the other way around.
(D)
...
Statistics : Posted by GMATNinja • on 22 Aug 2018, 04:39 • Replies 5 • Views 3735
![Midge Ure – A Man of Two Worlds (2026) [Official Digital Download 24bit/96kHz]](http://imghd.xyz/images/2026/05/09/zvc67e2mth34l_600.jpg)
.jpg)
