Hi Experts, I have a question here. I was debating between (C) and (E) and chose (C) over (E). Below is my understanding:
Premise: replace old bridge with a cable bridge even though this would be more expensive than building a concrete skyway.
Conclusion: The extra cost is clearly justified by the ''importance of maintaining the beauty of our river crossing.''
(C) = Negating (C) we get "The beauty of the river crossing need not be preserved." this way, how can the extra cost of the cable bridge be justified?
(E) Building a cable bridge across Black River would produce a ''more aesthetically pleasing result than building a concrete skyway. = but stimulus never talks about ''aesthetically pleasing'' part. Even if Concrete bridge is MORE AESTHETICALLY PLEASING, cable bridge can ''MAINTAIN the beauty of river bridge''.
Please help!
Premise: replace old bridge with a cable bridge even though this would be more expensive than building a concrete skyway.
Conclusion: The extra cost is clearly justified by the ''importance of maintaining the beauty of our river crossing.''
(C) = Negating (C) we get "The beauty of the river crossing need not be preserved." this way, how can the extra cost of the cable bridge be justified?
(E) Building a cable bridge across Black River would produce a ''more aesthetically pleasing result than building a concrete skyway. = but stimulus never talks about ''aesthetically pleasing'' part. Even if Concrete bridge is MORE AESTHETICALLY PLEASING, cable bridge can ''MAINTAIN the beauty of river bridge''.
Please help!
Statistics : Posted by ashutosh_73 • on 15 Mar 2011, 21:05 • Replies 9 • Views 7420
