Thank you so much very detailed and thoughtfulanswer.
That is an incorrect blanket statement. Past trends / what happened in other cities etc are relevant if they are meant to be relevant. You get clues in the question and options. e.g, when an option talks about a neighbouring city of similar size, what happened there usually becomes relevant in this city too. The author has given you clues "neighbouring" and "similar size" to tell you that the cities are comparable.
If you are talking about a certain route and what happened when this action was taken last time, it is relevant to what MAY happen if you take the same action again. We can certainly not eliminate these
...
KarishmaB wrote:
kpop1234567890 wrote:
The general advice is dont think that past trends will continue yet here we are saying that in D option something happened in past may be a behaviour in future. How come?
Can you weighin?
KarishmaB
GMATNinja
MartyMurray
GMATCoachBen
ScottTargetTestPrep
MartyTargetTestPrep
bb
Bunuel
Can you weighin?
KarishmaB
GMATNinja
MartyMurray
GMATCoachBen
ScottTargetTestPrep
MartyTargetTestPrep
bb
Bunuel
That is an incorrect blanket statement. Past trends / what happened in other cities etc are relevant if they are meant to be relevant. You get clues in the question and options. e.g, when an option talks about a neighbouring city of similar size, what happened there usually becomes relevant in this city too. The author has given you clues "neighbouring" and "similar size" to tell you that the cities are comparable.
If you are talking about a certain route and what happened when this action was taken last time, it is relevant to what MAY happen if you take the same action again. We can certainly not eliminate these
...
Statistics : Posted by kpop1234567890 • on 16 May 2011, 09:54 • Replies 40 • Views 69527











