Judge: The case before me involves a plaintiff and three codefendants. The plaintiff has applied to the court for an order permitting her to question each defendant without their codefendants or their codefendants’ legal counsel being present. Two of the codefendants, however, share the same legal counsel. The court will not order any codefendant to find new legal counsel. Therefore, the order requested by the plaintiff cannot be granted.
The conclusion of the judge’s argument is most strongly supported if which one of the following principles is assumed to hold?
(A) A court cannot issue an order that forces legal counsel to disclose information revealed by aclient . - WRONG. 2nd best. But revealing info is not solving the situation as in why court cannot order.
(B) Defendants have the right to have their legal counselpresent when being questioned. - CORRECT. If they didn't had then court could have ordered.
(C) People being questioned in legal proceedings[color=#ed1c24]
...
The conclusion of the judge’s argument is most strongly supported if which one of the following principles is assumed to hold?
(A) A court cannot issue an order that forces legal counsel to disclose information revealed by aclient . - WRONG. 2nd best. But revealing info is not solving the situation as in why court cannot order.
(B) Defendants have the right to have their legal counselpresent when being questioned. - CORRECT. If they didn't had then court could have ordered.
(C) People being questioned in legal proceedings[color=#ed1c24]
...
Statistics : Posted by unraveled • on 24 Nov 2019, 06:30 • Replies 10 • Views 5620
.jpg)
