AjiteshArun wrote:
ashutosh_73 wrote:
HiKarishmaB GMATNinja AjiteshArun MartyMurray
I couldn't make sense of the correct answer (B). Although none of the rest 4 seemed close but neither did (B).
If we choose B, aren't we making an assumption that behavior can be defined only in terms of flexible and noninstinctual?
Request you to break this down forme.
I couldn't make sense of the correct answer (B). Although none of the rest 4 seemed close but neither did (B).
If we choose B, aren't we making an assumption that behavior can be defined only in terms of flexible and noninstinctual?
Request you to break this down forme.
Quote:
2. Now, have a look at second half of the firstsentence:
Johnmg wrote:
... instinctualbehavior involves no reasoning and requires far fewer nerve cells than does noninstinctual...behavior.
These two cover the entire set of possibilities. That is, once we haveX and!X (!X means "not X"), everything must fit in {X +!X}.
HiAjiteshArun
Oh right!!! I didn't think of the binary relationship. ''Exclusively'' in B looked weird, but now i can make sense of it.
Thanks for detailed explanation.
Just to make sure whether i understood binary correctly: If i say, i am NOT NONCOMMITTAL, then i MUST be COMMITTAL.
I see it as: There is this China wall between NONCOMMITTAL & COMMITTAL,
...
Statistics : Posted by ashutosh_73 • on 28 Sep 2023, 03:58 • Replies 6 • Views 1346
.jpg)
