Best example of why it is MUST to stick to the argument from which conclusion isdrawn:
Below is the explanation by Manhattanfolk:
Once you've read an argument and found the conclusion, I recommend doing the followingthings.
[b] 1. Say the Conclusion, and then ask "how come? how do we know? what's the support?"
Adequate prenatal makes you less at risk of low birth wt babies.
how do weknow?
[b] 2. Find the Supporting reason(s).
Because there's a correlation between adequate prenatal care and low birth weight.
Does the correlation between born prematurely and low birth weight matter?
Not yet. We might be anticipating that they're inserting this filler for the sake of using it later or just for the sake of making more concepts available for trap answers.
But given that 1st sentence and 2nd sentence are each a correlation, we obviously care more about the 2nd one, since THAT correlation connects the cause/effect in the author's conclusion.
We should just prephrase this like we
...
Below is the explanation by Manhattanfolk:
Once you've read an argument and found the conclusion, I recommend doing the followingthings.
[b] 1. Say the Conclusion, and then ask "how come? how do we know? what's the support?"
Adequate prenatal makes you less at risk of low birth wt babies.
how do weknow?
[b] 2. Find the Supporting reason(s).
Because there's a correlation between adequate prenatal care and low birth weight.
Does the correlation between born prematurely and low birth weight matter?
Not yet. We might be anticipating that they're inserting this filler for the sake of using it later or just for the sake of making more concepts available for trap answers.
But given that 1st sentence and 2nd sentence are each a correlation, we obviously care more about the 2nd one, since THAT correlation connects the cause/effect in the author's conclusion.
We should just prephrase this like we
...
Statistics : Posted by ashutosh_73 • on 25 Aug 2017, 10:29 • Replies 11 • Views 12561







.jpg)

