Sajjad1994 wrote:
shauryahanda wrote:
HiSajjad1994 ,
For que 3, I do not see author expressing any of his own pov for Borges. He has simply stated what Borges has said and written. How can I call this complete acceptance?
Could you please share the officialanswer
For que 3, I do not see author expressing any of his own pov for Borges. He has simply stated what Borges has said and written. How can I call this complete acceptance?
Could you please share the officialanswer
The passage from Borges' lecture that is quoted in PassageA is presented as a way of supporting the author's own argument about the nature of literature. Borges suggests that the participation of the reader is essential to the literary text, and the author of Passage A agrees with this view. Therefore, the author of PassageA is expressing complete agreement with Borges'stance.
Borges’s interest in this particular
genre, of course, inspired a good deal of his own
(10) fiction, but his account also draws our attention to
an insight into the general nature of literature.
We donot know whether this is complete agreement or cautious neutrality or reluctance acceptance? The above sentence says that this account draws our attention to an insight into the general
...
Statistics : Posted by nikitathegreat • on 09 Mar 2023, 20:00 • Replies 10 • Views 2898
/fit-in/580x348/filters:format(webp)/english-betterindia/media/media_files/2026/05/18/tribal-forestry-2-2026-05-18-20-13-49.png)
