PReciSioN wrote:
GMATNinja KarishmaB @Experts.
The hypothesis is that - Extra positive strikes occur because of the presence of such (Smoke particles) particles in the storm clouds.
D) says - thunderstorms that occur in drifting clouds of smoke have extra +ve charge strikes weeks after theCHARGE of the smoke particles has dissipated. (not the smoke particles themselves, they could still be there, and infact presumably are still there as mentioned in the OG explanation that ("this means that even when drifting clouds of smokepersist....") .
Nowhere does the hypothesis claim that these smoke particles HAVE to be +vely charged to cause the +ve strikes. All it says is that the smoke particles cause the strikes, which they could still be doing even when their positive charge has dissipated. (Presumably by giving their +ve charge to other elements which are causing the strikes in which case they are still the cause albeit an indirect cause.
Would appreciate thoughts from Experts,
...
The hypothesis is that - Extra positive strikes occur because of the presence of such (Smoke particles) particles in the storm clouds.
D) says - thunderstorms that occur in drifting clouds of smoke have extra +ve charge strikes weeks after theCHARGE of the smoke particles has dissipated. (not the smoke particles themselves, they could still be there, and infact presumably are still there as mentioned in the OG explanation that ("this means that even when drifting clouds of smokepersist....") .
Nowhere does the hypothesis claim that these smoke particles HAVE to be +vely charged to cause the +ve strikes. All it says is that the smoke particles cause the strikes, which they could still be doing even when their positive charge has dissipated. (Presumably by giving their +ve charge to other elements which are causing the strikes in which case they are still the cause albeit an indirect cause.
Would appreciate thoughts from Experts,
...
Statistics : Posted by PReciSioN • on 30 May 2017, 21:34 • Replies 17 • Views 37117
.jpg)
