Aryaa03 wrote:
Sathvik02 wrote:
The poster proclaims: "Let the new biological pesticide containing micro-organisms be your new best friend! Because it's used by 4 out of every 5 florists, you can be sure that this product will answer your pesticide needs."
For C : Suppose florists were using something earlier, e.g. chemical pesticides, and they also shifted to that earlier from another brand. Doesn't it undermine the weightage given to the florists' choice as a trustful choice?
For C : Suppose florists were using something earlier, e.g. chemical pesticides, and they also shifted to that earlier from another brand. Doesn't it undermine the weightage given to the florists' choice as a trustful choice?
I understood what you want to convey. Let some product "x" be famous for only 2 years. The company will say "No problem we will make enough money in these two years". So the advertisement given may still be effective. Right? We don't have any timeline saying the product has to be for long term.
Statistics : Posted by Sathvik02 • on 26 Jan 2024, 01:30 • Replies 4 • Views 252
.jpg)
