imRaj wrote:
Quote:
HiKarishmaB , Can u pls explain me What's wrong with option D? Reliability means not trustable,right? Isn't that's what happening here.the biologist gives evidence through the studies that salinities less than 30 parts per thousand are unfavorable to sea-lice survival. Professor argument attacks it. He says less than 30 ppt is favourable for sea lice. So,one can doubt the evidence given by studies,right? ie. we cannot trust the trueness of the studies. What's the flaw in myanswer?
No, the argument does not question the reliability of the study.
Take a simpler example:
Numerous studies have found that lack of regular exercise in youth leads to lower muscle mass in later years.
But if people who do not exercise drink protein shakes regularly, they do not experience lower muscle mass later. (hypothetical example only!)
Does it mean we are doubting the studies? No. As a general rule, it is possible that what the studies say occurs. But when researching the same
...
Statistics : Posted by KarishmaB • on 28 Apr 2020, 09:26 • Replies 37 • Views 39264





