Sartore is a better movie reviewer than Kelly. A movie review should help readers determine whether or not they are apt to enjoy the movie, and a person who is likely to enjoy a particular movie is much more likely to realize this by reading a review by Sartore than a review by Kelly, even though Sartore is more likely to give a movie an unfavorable review than a favorable one.
Statement implies that Sartores truthful reviews, even if they are harsher, are more likely to allow readers to understand whether they will enjoy the movie.
We need to find an answer that leads us to further believe that Sartore is a better reviewer.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
(A) Sartore has technical knowledge of film, whereas Kelly is merely a fan.
Technical knowledge is irrelevant. This is out
(B) Most of Kelly's movie reviews are unfavorable to the movie being reviewed.
We need to understand how sartore is a better reviewer than Kelly. This answer doesn’t
...
Statement implies that Sartores truthful reviews, even if they are harsher, are more likely to allow readers to understand whether they will enjoy the movie.
We need to find an answer that leads us to further believe that Sartore is a better reviewer.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
(A) Sartore has technical knowledge of film, whereas Kelly is merely a fan.
Technical knowledge is irrelevant. This is out
(B) Most of Kelly's movie reviews are unfavorable to the movie being reviewed.
We need to understand how sartore is a better reviewer than Kelly. This answer doesn’t
...
Statistics : Posted by thisischelso • on 21 Apr 2018, 01:00 • Replies 12 • Views 5785
/english-betterindia/media/post_attachments/uploads/2023/03/dr-prasad-deodhar-1-1679902706.jpg)
