Sk1003 wrote:
Reviewers of Orville Dennison's first book on medieval art have alleged a number of inaccuracies, but these charges are plainly absurd. Dennison has a long history of publishing magazine articles on art. No critic has found any errors in these publications. It is likely, then, that the critics of the book are wrong.
Which of the following would, if true, most seriously weaken the above argument?
A) Books on art tend to receive many more published reviews than do magazine articles on art.
B) Magazine articles tend to go through less rigorous prepublication fact-checking than do most books.
C) Magazine articles often draw from books for factual information.
D) Factual errors in books can be corrected more easily than errors in magazine articles.
E) Writings on medieval art appear more often in books than inmagazines.
Such a nice gmat trap between A andB.
Prethinking: Book - Errors but Magazines ( so many magazines yet ) - NoError
Maybe there is a disparity in
...
Statistics : Posted by sachi-in • on 11 Feb 2024, 21:07 • Replies 3 • Views 293









