Critical Reasoning (CR) | Re: ­Editorial: It is unreasonable for the neighborhoods near Maple Square

Conclusion: It is unreasonable for the neighborhoods near Maple Square to claim that the proliferation of convenience stores in their communities is the result of zoning changes that drove convenience stores out of Maple Squareitself.

Premise: None of the operators of the stores that were closed down in the Maple Square have opened convenience stores in the surroundingneighborhoods.

So, the correct answer maysay: it is RESONABLE to think that ZONING caused the PROLIFERATION of conveniencestores.

Stimulus got methinking: But what if, because of zoning changes, new convenience stores will opt out of Maple street and rather choose the neighborhood areas?

A) The proprietors of the convenience stores in the Maple Stores tended to spend long hours in their stores and to know many of their regular customers by name.

So what? Zoning can still be responsible. Doesn'tweaken.

B) While some neighborhoods seek to exclude convenience stores because they cause an increase in traffic, others
...

Statistics : Posted by ashutosh_73 • on 01 Mar 2024, 21:09 • Replies 1 • Views 139

---