Uroshoil only causes rashes to humans, not other animals. Therefore, the presence of uroshoil is probably not as a chemical defense in these plants. We are to support thisargument.
A. Wood rats build their nests using dead, brittle branches, not liveones.
This is weakening theargument.
B. A number of different animals use poison oak and poison ivy as foodsources.
Correct. These plants are being eaten by these animals yet the plants didn't 'evolve' anything in them that might prevent the plants from beingeaten.
C. It is common for plants to defend themselves by producing chemicalsubstances.
This is weakening the argument ifanything.
D. In approximately 85 percent of the human population, very small amounts of urushiol can cause arash.
Adds a fact that does not do anything to theargument.
E. Poison oak and poison ivy grow particularly well in places where humans have altered natural forestecosystems.
Took me a while, but this statement adds nothing to the argument really.
...
This is weakening theargument.
B. A number of different animals use poison oak and poison ivy as foodsources.
Correct. These plants are being eaten by these animals yet the plants didn't 'evolve' anything in them that might prevent the plants from beingeaten.
This is weakening the argument ifanything.
Adds a fact that does not do anything to theargument.
Took me a while, but this statement adds nothing to the argument really.
...
Statistics : Posted by LamboWalker • on 20 Feb 2024, 18:14 • Replies 4 • Views 550






