SHSAHOO wrote:
First, let's review theargument:
- In the lab, we had two groups of mice: Group A was fed reduced-calorie diets while Group B's caloric intake was not reduced. Group A lived longer, and some doctors concluded that reducing calories in human diets could increase humanlifespans.
- But the dietary researcher disagrees: the researcher notes that Group A's "reduced" diet actually represented a natural/optimal diet for animals in their natural habitats and that Group A's "increased" life spans were actually just "normal" lifespans.
- In other words, the researcher is pointing out that the study did NOT involve (1) mice eating a natural/optimal diet and (2) mice eating LESS than natural/optimal. Instead, it involved (1) mice eating a natural/optimal diet and (2) mice eating MORE than natural/optimal. So even though the study does suggest that eating MORE than natural/optimal is bad, it does NOT
...Statistics : Posted by GMATNinja • on 07 Jan 2010, 22:36 • Replies 10 • Views 8353
.jpg)
